Skip to Content
AlternativesCurate-Me vs Langfuse

Curate-Me vs Langfuse

Langfuse is the leading open-source LLM observability and evaluation platform. By the time of acquisition it had 2,000+ paying customers, 20K+ GitHub stars, 26M+ SDK installs per month, and was trusted by 19 of the Fortune 50. In January 2026, Langfuse was acquired by ClickHouse as part of a $400M Series D that valued ClickHouse at $15B.

Langfuse is observability-first; its strengths are tracing, evaluations, and prompt management. Curate-Me is governance-first; our strengths are cost caps, PII scanning, HITL approvals, and managed agent runners. The two are often complementary — but if you’re picking one platform, here’s how they compare.


Feature comparison

CapabilityCurate-MeLangfuse
LLM proxy / gateway50 providers (44 production-ready)Not a proxy — observability via SDK instrumentation
Deployment modelFully managed (SaaS)Self-hosted (OSS) or Langfuse Cloud, ClickHouse-backed
Distributed tracingW3C trace context, span-level costIndustry-leading; nested traces, generations, spans
EvaluationsNot availableLLM-as-judge, custom scorers, dataset experiments
Prompt managementNot availableVersioned prompts, releases, A/B testing
Cost trackingPer-request, per-key, per-org hierarchiesPer-trace, per-user, per-feature
Rate limitingIETF-standard, per-keyNot available
PII scanning33 regex patterns + optional Presidio NERRedaction filters in SDK
Content safety scanningPrompt injection + jailbreak detectionNot available
HITL approval queuesBuilt-in, configurable thresholdsNot available
Managed execution environmentsOpenClaw runners with full lifecycleNot available
In-container governanceMCP server (50 tools)Not available
Desktop streamingLive VNC/RDP monitoringNot available
A2A communicationProtocol with PII scanningTrace propagation between services
Storage architectureMongoDB + Redis (portable)ClickHouse (post-acquisition, integral to platform)
Open-sourceNoYes (MIT, with EE features)
Future directionGovernance-first, runner-nativeClickHouse analytics integration

Where Langfuse is stronger

  • Observability depth: Langfuse is purpose-built for tracing and evaluation. Nested traces with generations, spans, and scores are best-in-class.
  • Evaluations: LLM-as-judge, custom scorers, and dataset-based experiments are core features. We do not ship evaluations today.
  • Prompt management: Versioned prompts with releases, A/B testing, and production traffic splitting.
  • Community and adoption: 20K+ GitHub stars, 26M SDK installs/month, 2K+ paying customers, 19 of Fortune 50. The most adopted OSS LLM observability platform.
  • Self-hostable: MIT-licensed, full source available. You own your data.

Where Curate-Me is stronger

  • Gateway with governance: Langfuse is SDK-based observability — it sees what you tell it to see. We’re a transparent gateway with 14-stage governance applied to every request, including PII, content safety, and rate limits.
  • HITL approvals: High-cost or sensitive requests held for human review with auto-replay. Required for EU AI Act Article 14 compliance. Langfuse has no equivalent.
  • PII scanning and content safety: Every request scanned for secrets, PII, prompt injection, and jailbreak attempts before reaching the provider. Langfuse can redact at instrumentation time but doesn’t enforce policy.
  • Managed runners: Full agent execution environments — sandboxed containers with lifecycle management, desktop streaming, fleet orchestration. Langfuse is observability only.
  • In-container governance: MCP server with 50 tools running inside the execution environment for cost caps, tool restrictions, A2A communication.
  • Architecture portability: Our storage stack is MongoDB + Redis. Langfuse is built on ClickHouse, which means post-acquisition the platform’s roadmap is tied to ClickHouse’s analytics direction.

When to choose Langfuse

  • Tracing, evaluations, and prompt management are your primary needs
  • You want the most mature OSS observability platform with a large community
  • You’re comfortable with the ClickHouse-backed architecture and roadmap
  • You don’t need a gateway, governance enforcement, or managed runners (private beta)
  • You want to self-host and own the entire stack

When to choose Curate-Me

  • You need a gateway with enforced governance, not just observability
  • You run AI agents that need execution environments (not just LLM calls)
  • You need HITL approvals, PII scanning, or content safety as enforcement (not just visibility)
  • You want one platform instead of stitching Langfuse + a proxy + a runner platform
  • You need an immutable audit trail for compliance (EU AI Act, SOC 2)

Using them together

Langfuse and Curate-Me play well together. Many teams instrument with Langfuse for tracing/evals while running their traffic through Curate-Me for governance. Both support W3C trace context, so trace IDs propagate cleanly. If you’re using both today, you can keep doing that.


Ready to try it? Follow the Quick Start to connect in under 5 minutes.